Honesty time: I really liked this movie- twenty plus years ago when it was called The Running Man. This teched up retread of that film is basically CGI fluff surrounded a gooey center that is essential a weak, predictable story. It's good if you want to see stuff blow up, but other than that it's worth a pass. Basic action fluff.
Friday, May 21, 2010
Gamer (2009) *1/2
Honesty time: I really liked this movie- twenty plus years ago when it was called The Running Man. This teched up retread of that film is basically CGI fluff surrounded a gooey center that is essential a weak, predictable story. It's good if you want to see stuff blow up, but other than that it's worth a pass. Basic action fluff.
Monday, May 17, 2010
Daybreakers (2009) ***
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ee3b/8ee3be5eb97f1e632648870cb542f47817205ac5" alt=""
The film follows Edward (Ethan Hawke), a hematologist trying to come up with a blood substitute ti curb the growing shortage of human blood. Edward's boss (Sam Neil) is intent on pushing some kind of substitute not for the benefit of vamp kind, but for his company's profit margins. He has set up a facility that farms the blood from humans in suspended animation, but even that isn't enough. The next quarter is coming up and blood suckers never change. A chance accident leads Edward, who is the equivalent of a vampire pacifist because he avoids human blood, to "Elvis" (Willem Dafoe), who seems to have found a way to reverse the effects of vampirism.
Daybreakers is a hell of a concept. As a broad concept the idea of a post apocalyptic world that is still very much intact is a fresh and different idea. To see a vampire movie in this day in age that doesn't feature glittering or chasing depressed 17 year olds is also nice considering the amount of vampire garbage I'm sure we'll get thrown at us soon enough. The idea is great and the first half of the movie really shines. The problem comes during the second half. It's as if all of the effort afforded setting up the story drained the participants and caused the film to suffer into the credits. I can't pinpoint what exactly was wrong with the last forty minutes other than it's little things like hokey dialogue and some plot points that get a little too silly. Willem Dafoe is totally wasted as Elvis, a role that he is much too good for and it shows. Maybe that's where it starts to decline. Who knows.
One thing I will say about Daybreakers is that it has some originality to it. Of course the metaphors are blaring out at you, mainly when comparing the blood shortage with an oil shortage. It's not striking, but it's there. It's an interesting movie that could have been a little crisper.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)